[1ST SERIES] IS “ISLAMIST” SUICIDE BOMBING IN THE MIDDLE EAST REALLY MOTIVATED BY RELIGION?
BY: DAN PETERSON
The so-called “New
Atheists” differ from previous generations of vocal unbelievers (e.g., Bertrand
Russell and Antony Flew) by not merely repudiating the existence of God but
aggressively denying the moral legitimacy and cultural value of religious faith.
They’re fond of citing the great 17th-century mathematician and philosopher
Blaise Pascal: “Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully,” he said, “as
when they do it from religious conviction.”
And nothing has played
so well into the hands of the New Atheists in this regard than the violence
associated over the past couple of decades with fundamentalist Islam. It’s
believers in God, partisans of the New Atheism observe, who strap bombs to
their backs and fly airplanes into buildings. “For good people to do evil
things,” the outspokenly atheistic Nobel laureate physicist Steven Weinberg has
famously said, “that takes religion.”
Of course, matters
aren’t quite so simple as some imagine. Pascal himself, for instance, was a
very devoted Christian, and Weinberg shared his 1979 Nobel Prize with Mohammad
Abdus Salam, a devout Anglo-Pakistani Muslim who quoted the Quran in his
acceptance speech. But the fundamental problem with blaming religion for
suicide bombings may surprise many readers: The data simply don’t support the
charge. Not by a long shot.
In 2005, Robert Pape
of the University of Chicago published a vitally important book titled “Dying
to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism.” It’s based upon meticulous
analysis of every suicide attack occurring anywhere in the world between 1980,
when modern suicide terrorism began, and 2003.
Pape’s case is
factually rich and rigorously argued. “The data show,” he concludes, “that
there is little connection between suicide terrorism and Islamic
fundamentalism, or any one of the world’s religions. In fact, the leading
instigators of suicide attacks are the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka, a
Marxist-Leninist group whose members are from Hindu families but who are
adamantly opposed to religion.”
Comments
Post a Comment